Wouldn’t this imply bitcoin can currently be spent without a private key?

· Non-malleability: ECDSA signatures are inherently malleable, which may enable a third party without access to the private key to alter an existing valid signature and double-spend funds. This issue was formally discussed in BIP62. In comparison, Schnorr signatures are provably non-mal…
Schnorr Signatures & The Inevitability of Privacy in Bitcoin
2.3K
8
Lucas Nuzzi
Jack Purdy
·Follow
1 min read·
Jun 18, 2019
--
Wouldn’t this imply bitcoin can currently be spent without a private key?
--
--
Written by Jack Purdy389 Followers
·188 Following
Writing A Life Examined newsletter | Director of Sales @Messari
Responses (1)
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams